|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |

Max Kolonko
High Voltage Industries Ash Alliance
234
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 14:44:00 -
[1] - Quote
CCP, we really need something done to POS'es.
It getting harder and harder to acomodate our own corp members in our poses, even though we have capacity in terms of m3 for ships and cargo.
The reason is there are only 3 levels of access that can be set to modules. There are no provate hangars or sma.
I have almost 200 people i try to acomodate on 5 poses in my WH.
They have everyday problems with onlining/oflining sma's and hangars (and for that they need hi level of access to pos). with access to specific access that i can not set public to all, but at the same time i can not define sufficent level of access to sort it out so that all people that should have access have that access without giving access to similar modules and any other pos.
What i'm saying is that any fix to POS will not only help me or other director. not only the enablers will get easier life, but all POS living members of my alliance.
Therefore what i find in minutes is pure nonsense and lack of understanding of POS life from CCP perspective.
It seams from me that POS'es are viewed only from the "moon-goo-mining" point of view, where indeed, one person use the pos. but in many places people live in poses, and in that situation all of members living out of it will feel the impact of any improvements.
That is extremly important to all WH residents. We have to go miles out of our way to ensure our assets are secure AND that our ally/corp members have a place to live at the same time. Its not only problem to us - the enablers, but TO ALL PEOPLE LIVING OUT OF POS Read and support: Don't mess with OUR WH's What is Your stance on WH stuff? |

Max Kolonko
High Voltage Industries Ash Alliance
236
|
Posted - 2013.01.19 09:55:00 -
[2] - Quote
Going back to argument of poses affecting only small part of comunity
Apart from WH's which should be obviuos that it touched ALL WH DWELLERS.
Look at this topic from different perspective - WHY THE HELL did you reiterated FW? It was only small part of comunity, right? So why bother?
BECAUSE you made it better andthat followed with increase in usage of FW.
Now go back to what You wanted to do with POS'es - personal POSes? MINI POSes for small corps? Ability to expand without removing the proevious? Ability to put POSES anywhere and multiple POS on grid? Heck, even wild idea from grascale: POS Warp Drive...
Now let me tell you something - implement these things, and you will get a HUGGGGGEEEE increase in POS usage from all over the EVE:
- players will place their SOLO POS - small corps will try to place "covert" footholds in enemy teritory by placeing poses in some deep spots - players will go with emergent gameplay like putting poses near gates as chokepoints for incoming fleets (if that will be available) - players will build wonderfull strongholds with those - where lack of forcefield would actually make teraing them down a chalange and not tedious work
Just think how many players then would be affected - new ways of fight with poses (how many people today POS BASH? Thousands!!!! New ways of player housing, New ways of defending your home system.... and so on and so forth....
Go get You **** together and think Big on this - the whole Community of EVE will be very greatfull. Not only the enablers.
Read and support: Don't mess with OUR WH's What is Your stance on WH stuff? |

Max Kolonko
High Voltage Industries Ash Alliance
239
|
Posted - 2013.01.19 23:41:00 -
[3] - Quote
Another thing: in the minutes You guys say again and again that You want to make Enablers life easier - and at the same time, you shove away redesign of one of the biggest pain in the butt for us.
Good job. Read and support: Don't mess with OUR WH's What is Your stance on WH stuff? |

Max Kolonko
High Voltage Industries Ash Alliance
245
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 23:44:00 -
[4] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Jada Maroo wrote:You're still not getting a POS revamp this year. Not a full-blown one, no. But the CSM is pushing very, very hard for CCP to get some new POS stuff onto the development agenda. Every one of our theme presentations (sent to Seagull over the weekend) pointed out reasons why this is important. CSM will also push hard to make the results of the release planning process -- or at least, a broad overview of them -- public as soon as possible after things are locked down.
Like someone few post above of You said: maybe its time for another crowd-voting on priorities? Read and support: Don't mess with OUR WH's What is Your stance on WH stuff? |
|
|
|